> > Curious, why is RSTP in user space? Lots of protocols are in the kernel, > why not RSTP too? For one thing it is easier from a development standpoint. The kernel just needs to provide hooks for allowing userspace programs to send and receive BPDUs and to change port states. The STP logic can then be moved to userspace and it is easier to develop and debug. > > Are any known issues with the in kernel STP? > > I haven't read 802.1D-2004 but I know RSTP is in there, does RSTP > replace the old STP protocol? If not, is there any reason to prefer STP > before RSTP in some cases? In 802.1D-2004, RSTP replaces the old STP. RSTP provides additional mechanisms to give faster convergence when the network involves only point-to-point links. It is backward compatible with STP, i.e., it will interoperate correctly when there are other STP bridges, though you lose the fast convergence then. So, in general, there is no reason to prefer STP to RSTP. Currently, the main reason would be that the STP implementation has been around much longer and that this RSTP implementation is new. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
