On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:35:59 +0100 (CET) andreas@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get bridging to work between eth0 and usb0: > > 192.168.13.2 <---> br0:192.168.13.47 <---> 192.168.13.1 > usb0 eth0 > > 192.168.13.2:~ # ping 192.168.13.1 > ... 100 % packet loss > > On 192.168.13.1 I do see the arp requests but no icmp packet :-/ > > Just like "No traffic gets trough (except ARP and STP)" in the > FAQ on http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge > > Except ... > > I can ping 192.168.13.1 from the bridge (192.168.13.47) > Trying to ping 192.168.13.2 from the bridge does not work > I do see the arp requests for 192.168.13.2 on 192.168.13.1 (!) > > I get the same result if if enable STP on the bridge. > > What is going wrong here? :-/ > > Any hint appreciated! > > Regards, > andreas > > > PS: The bridge system is a SUSE 10.2 with kernel 2.6.18.8-0.7-default > (incl. suse patches) usb0 is a MosChip usb nic using the mcs7830 driver > and eth0 is an on board intel nic. both work fine in non bridging mode. > > my routing table (just ignore the vmnet stuff): > > bibo:/proc/sys/net/ipv4 # route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet8 > 192.168.13.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0 > 10.0.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet1 > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo > 0.0.0.0 192.168.13.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 br0 Please reproduce without the interference of the proprietary VMware network. Since VM networking does it's own bridging, I suspect interference. Or go bug SUSE support -- Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
