On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:37:39 +0800 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So we have an unsolvable problem here then, unless infrastructure gets added > > that allows a module to declare itself as not-implicit-unload-safe, forcing > > modprobe -r to keep its hands off it. Ugly. > > Yes I've always wanted to have a separate count that indicates > a module is in use but does not prevent its immediate removal. > > Cheers, It is only the nested removal problem. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
