Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Could you split out the link state monitoring, and look at bonding to see > how they are doing it? > > I have a fix for vlan code that passes MII and ethtool requests from the virtual > to physical device, so the bridge code wouldn't need to the hack about root device. > Stephen, I've attached two patches that implement link state monitoring as described above. De bridge-utils patch also fixes a small bug: ./brctl stp TEST Segmentation fault -- Mark Ruijter. bridge@xxxxxxxxxxx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: linux-2.6.7-bridge_linkstate.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 8578 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20040720/f363ad9f/linux-2.6.7-bridge_linkstate.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bridge-utils-1.0.4-2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 5786 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20040720/f363ad9f/bridge-utils-1.0.4-2.bin
