Re: Debugging early SError exception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 22.12.23 um 08:03 schrieb Lior Weintraub:
Hi,

I managed to dump the __log_buf but for some reason the UART is still not working.
Please note that UART printed all the U-BOOT traces so AFAIU, the device tree is set correctly.
(Barebox is passing it's DTB into kernel).

To enable the earlyprintk I have:
1. Compiled the kernel with CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y
2. Modified the boot args to include: "console=ttyS0,115200n8 earlycon=dw-apb-uart,0xd000307000"
3. Verified that dw-apb-uart driver (8250_early.c) supports earlycon:
OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE(uart, "snps,dw-apb-uart", early_serial8250_setup);

 From __log_buf dump:
Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x410fd034]4]
Linux version 6.5.0 (pliops@dev-liorw) (aarch64-buildroot-linux-gnu-gcc.br_real (Buildroot 2023.02.1-95-g8391404e23) 11.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.38) #107 SMP Thu Dec 21 17:33:12 IST 202323
Machine model: Pliops Spider MK-I EVKVK
efi: UEFI not found.d.
Zone ranges:s:
   DMA      [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000002fffffff]f]
   DMA32    emptyty
   Normal   emptyty
Movable zone start for each nodede
Early memory node rangeses
   node   0: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000002fffffff]f]
Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000002fffffff]f]
percpu: Embedded 25 pages/cpu s64800 r8192 d29408 u10240000
pcpu-alloc: s64800 r8192 d29408 u102400 alloc=25*4096
pcpu-alloc: [0] 0
Detected VIPT I-cache on CPU0U0
CPU features: GIC system register CPU interface present but disabled by higher exception levelel
CPU features: detected: ARM erratum 84571919
alternatives: applying boot alternativeses
Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,115200n8 earlycon=dw-apb-uart,0xd00030700000
Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes, linear)r)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes, linear)r)
Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 19353636
mem auto-init: stack:off, heap alloc:off, heap free:offff
software IO TLB: area num 1.1.
software IO TLB: mapped [mem 0x000000002b080000-0x000000002f080000] (64MB)B)
Memory: 689240K/786432K available (5824K kernel code, 1186K rwdata, 1612K rodata, 1600K init, 400K bss, 97192K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)d)
SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1=1
trace event string verifier disableded
rcu: Hierarchical RCU implementation.n.
rcu: 	RCU event tracing is enabled.d.
rcu: 	RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=256 to nr_cpu_ids=1.1.
rcu: RCU calculated value of scheduler-enlistment delay is 25 jiffies.s.
rcu: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=16, nr_cpu_ids=1=1
NR_IRQS: 64, nr_irqs: 64, preallocated irqs: 0 0
GICv3: 96 SPIs implementeded
GICv3: 0 Extended SPIs implementeded
Root IRQ handler: gic_handle_irqrq
GICv3: GICv3 features: 16 PPIsIs
GICv3: CPU0: found redistributor 0 region 0:0x000000e00006000000
GICv3: redistributor failed to wakeup.....
GICv3: GIC: unable to set SRE (disabled at EL2), panic aheadad

I think the two messages above are the essential ones.

Maybe it helps to check

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.3/arm64/booting.html

In the middle of that page in the "Call the kernel image" it has something about GIC:

-- cut --
If the kernel is entered at EL1:

        ICC.SRE_EL2.Enable (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1
        ICC_SRE_EL2.SRE (bit 0) must be initialised to 0b1.
-- cut --

Internal error: Oops - Undefined instruction: 0000000062383019 [#1] SMPMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.5.0 #107
Hardware name: Pliops Spider MK-I EVK (DT)
pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x58/0x2e4
lr : gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x2a4/0x2e4
sp : ffff8000808f3b40
x29: ffff8000808f3b40 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000001
x26: ffff000000016040 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff800080a6b000
x23: ffff8000808fc320 x22: ffff8000809cc000 x21: ffff00002fe74670
x20: ffff800080a90000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: fffffffffffe0b10
x17: ffff8000809f9480 x16: fffffc0000002248 x15: ffff80008090af28
x14: fffffffffffc0b0f x13: 6461656861206369 x12: 6e6170202c29324c
x11: 452074612064656c x10: 6261736964282045 x9 : 6428204552532074
x8 : ffff80008090af28 x7 : ffff8000808f3970 x6 : 000000000000000c
x5 : 000000000000002a x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000808fd0c0 x0 : 000000000000003c
Call trace:
  gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x58/0x2e4
  gic_cpu_init.part.0+0xa8/0x114
  gic_init_bases+0x408/0x684
  gic_of_init+0x298/0x300
  of_irq_init+0x1c8/0x368
  irqchip_init+0x14/0x1c
  init_IRQ+0x98/0xac
  start_kernel+0x250/0x5b8
  __primary_switched+0xb4/0xbc
Code: 9260df39 d3441f33 d538cca0 36001180 (d538cc80) )
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]-----
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!k!
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]-----


The kernel panic is related to GIC distributor (currently under debug) but AFAIU,
this has nothing to do with the UART not working on early stages.


Yes, I agree. GIC issue and UART (at least the polling mode) should be indendent.

Best regards

Dirk


Thanks in advanced for your advice,
Cheers,
Lior.

-----Original Message-----
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:37 PM
To: Lior Weintraub <liorw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-embedded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Debugging early SError exception

[You don't often get email from hs@xxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: External Sender

Hi Lior,

On 21.12.23 12:19, Dirk Behme wrote:
Am 21.12.23 um 11:04 schrieb Lior Weintraub:
Thanks Dirk,

Regarding the earlyprintk, not sure I know how to make it work.
I have defined CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y on my
config but it doesn't seem to work.
Do I need to pass something in the bootargs from the U-BOOT?
Do I need to add that into my device tree?
(Tried to set bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 earlyprintk"; under "chosen"
on my DT but it didn't
work)

Yes, what has to be enabled and what not and what has to be set how is often
confusing. I think this
is not common for all systems, so I think to be on the safe side you have to look
into the code for
you system. Or short; The code is the documentation ;)


The UART I am using is "snps,dw-apb-uart".

Last week, to output the early logs I have implemented this hack:
1. Modify printk macro to run my print_func
2. This print_func wrote the characters into a single global variable (u32
simul_uart;)
3. Get the address location of this global variable and extract all writes to it
from the Tarmac
logs.

This is a very slow and tedious process but it helped me identify the initial
SError.
Initially I thought I can write directly into the UART FIFO register (which I know
the address)
but this didn't work because Linux already setup the MMU so I guess I need to
know the virtual
address of this FIFO.
Do I need to use __phys_to_virt of some sort?

Yes, I think so. Have a look to the existing serial driver, too. It should do whats
needed, and you
can borrow that, then.

If you have access to the RAM after the crash (through a debugger or in
your bootloader) and your mem is stable, find out the address of __log_buf
in System.map. Thats the buffer where printk writes into it, and so dumping
the content is what you would see in case uart works...

Hope it helps!

bye,
Heiko

Best regards

Dirk


Cheers,
Lior.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 10:30 AM
To: Lior Weintraub <liorw@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-embedded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Debugging early SError exception

[You don't often get email from dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: External Sender

Am 21.12.23 um 08:43 schrieb Lior Weintraub:
Hi Dirk,

We found that the issue was at the early stages of Barebox (a.k.a U-BOOT
v2).

Glad to hear that! :)

Our implementation of putc_ll (on debug_ll) was writing into the UART Tx
FIFO without checking if the FIFO is full.
Once the fifo got full it caused this SError probably because the UART IP
generated an apberror signal.

Thanks for the report!

Now the Linux is running and doesn't report the SError again but now we
face another issue.
We see that the PC is getting into a "report_bug" function.
The Linux doesn't print anything to the UART (probably since it hasn't got to
the point where the console is configured?).

For cases like this using earlyprintk is usually a good option. Check
the Linux kernel serial console (UART) dirver of you SoC if it
supports it. In the end it should be "just" a function in the serial
console driver which outputs the console data via polling before
(later) the interrupt driven console part takes over.

Best regards

Dirk


Since our debug means are limited it can take some time to find the root
cause.

I will keep you posted and update our findings.
Love to hear your thoughts,

Cheers,
Lior.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 3:37 PM
To: Lior Weintraub <liorw@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-embedded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Debugging early SError exception

[You don't often get email from dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: External Sender

Am 19.12.23 um 14:23 schrieb Lior Weintraub:
Thanks Dirk,

Welcome :)

In case you find the root cause it would be nice to get some generic
description of it so that we can learn something :)

Best regards

Dirk


-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 9:09 AM
To: Lior Weintraub <liorw@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
embedded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Debugging early SError exception

[You don't often get email from dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx. Learn why this
is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: External Sender

Am 17.12.23 um 22:32 schrieb Lior Weintraub:
Hi,

We have a new SoC with eLinux porting (kernel v6.5).
This SoC is ARM64 (A53) single core based device.
It runs correctly on QEMU but fails with SError on emulation platform
(Synopsys Zebu running our SoC model).
There is no debugger connected to this emulation but there are several
debug capabilities we can use:
1. Generating wave dump of CPU signals
2. Generate a Tarmac log
3. UART

Since the SError happens at early stages of Linux boot the UART is not
enabled yet.
     From the Tarmac log we can see:
      3824884521 ps  ES  (ffff800080760888:d65f03c0) O el1h_ns:   ret
(parse_early_param)
      3824884522 ps  ES  (ffff800080763a60:d2801800) O el1h_ns:   mov
x0,
#0xc0   //      #192    (setup_arch)
                         R X0 (AARCH64) 00000000 000000c0
      3824884523 ps  ES  (ffff800080763a64:d51b4220) O el1h_ns:   msr
daif,   x0      (setup_arch)
                         R CPSR 600000c5
      3824884529 ps  ES  System Error (Abort)
                         EXC [0x380] SError/vSError Current EL with SP_ELx
                         R ESR_EL1 (AARCH64) bf000002
                         R CPSR 600003c5
                         R SPSR_EL1 (AARCH64) 600000c5
                         R ELR_EL1 (AARCH64) ffff8000 80763a68
      3824884925 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b80:d10543ff) O el1h_ns:   sub
sp,
sp,     #0x150  (vectors)
                         R SP_EL1 (AARCH64) ffff8000 808f3c50
      3824884925 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b84:8b2063ff) O el1h_ns:   add
sp,
sp,     x0      (vectors)
                         R SP_EL1 (AARCH64) ffff8000 808f3d10
      3824884926 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b88:cb2063e0) O el1h_ns:   sub
x0,
sp,     x0      (vectors)
                         R X0 (AARCH64) ffff8000 808f3c50
      3824884927 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b8c:37700080) O el1h_ns:   tbnz
w0,
#14,    ffff800080010b9c        <vectors+0x39c>         (vectors)
      3824884935 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b90:cb2063e0) O el1h_ns:   sub
x0,
sp,     x0      (vectors)
                         R X0 (AARCH64) 00000000 000000c0
      3824884937 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b94:cb2063ff) O el1h_ns:   sub
sp,
sp,     x0      (vectors)
                         R SP_EL1 (AARCH64) ffff8000 808f3c50
      3824884938 ps  ES  (ffff800080010b98:140001ef) O el1h_ns:   b
ffff800080011354        <el1h_64_error>         (vectors)

If I understand correctly, the exception happened sometime earlier
and
only
now Linux boot code (setup_arch) opened the exception handling and as
a
result we immediately jump to the SError exception handler.


Yes, that sounds reasonable. If I understood correctly, you are
running something "quite new" on some software (QEMU) and
hardware
(Synopsis) simulators.

That would mean that you have new hardware with e.g. new memory
map
not used before. What you describe might sound like in the code before
Linux (boot loader) there is anything resulting in the SError. This
might be an access to non-existing or non-enabled hardware. I.e. it
might be that you try to access (read/write) an address what is not
available, yet (or just invalid). It's hard to debug that. In case you
are able to modify the code before Linux (the boot loader?) you might
try to enable SError exceptions, there, too. To get it earlier and
with that make the search window smaller. I'm not that familiar with
QEMU, but could you try to trace which (all?) hardware accesses your
code does. And with that analyse all accesses and with that check if
all these accesses are valid even on the hardware (Synopsis) emulation
system? That should be checked from valid address and from hardware
subsystem enablement point of view.

Hth,

Dirk


     From the Linux source:
          parse_early_param();

          dynamic_scs_init();

          /*
           * Unmask asynchronous aborts and fiq after bringing up possible
           * earlycon. (Report possible System Errors once we can report
this
           * occurred).
           */
          local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ); <---- This is when we
get
the
exception.

After some kernel hacking (replacing printk) we could extract the logs:
6Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x410fd034]
5Linux version 6.5.0 (pliops@dev-liorw) (aarch64-buildroot-linux-gnu-
gcc.br_real (Buildroot 2023.02.1-95-g8391404e23) 11.3.0, GNU ld
(GNU
Binutils) 2.38) #101 SMP Sun Dec 17 20:09:06 IST 2023
6Machine model: Pliops Spider MK-I EVK
2SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0x00000000bf000002 -- SError
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0 #101
Hardware name: Pliops Spider MK-I EVK (DT)
pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : setup_arch+0x13c/0x5ac
lr : setup_arch+0x134/0x5ac
sp : ffff8000808f3da0
x29: ffff8000808f3da0c x28: 0000000008758074c x27:
0000000005e31b58c
x26: 0000000000000001c x25: 0000000007e5f728c x24:
ffff8000808f8000c
x23: ffff8000808f8600c x22: ffff8000807b6000c x21:
ffff800080010000c
x20: ffff800080a1e000c x19: fffffbfffddfe190c x18:
000000002266684ac
x17: 00000000fcad60bbc x16: 0000000000001800c x15:
0000000000000008c
x14: ffffffffffffffffc x13: 0000000000000000c x12:
0000000000000003c
x11: 0101010101010101c x10: ffffffffffee87dfc x9 :
0000000000000038c
x8 : 0101010101010101c x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7fc x6 :
0000000000000001c
x5 : 0000000000000000c x4 : 8000000000000000c x3 :
0000000000000065c
x2 : 0000000000000000c x1 : 0000000000000000c x0 :
00000000000000c0c
0Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0 #101
Hardware name: Pliops Spider MK-I EVK (DT)
Call trace:
      dump_backtrace+0x9c/0xd0
      show_stack+0x14/0x1c
      dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x58
      dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
      panic+0x2e0/0x33c
      nmi_panic+0x68/0x6c
      arm64_serror_panic+0x68/0x78
      do_serror+0x24/0x54
      el1h_64_error_handler+0x2c/0x40
      el1h_64_error+0x64/0x68
      setup_arch+0x13c/0x5ac
      start_kernel+0x5c/0x5b8
      __primary_switched+0xb4/0xbc
0---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt ]---

Can you please advice how to proceed with debugging?

Thanks in advanced,
Cheers,
Lior.








--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52   Fax: +49-8142-66989-80   Email: hs@xxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux