Re: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yeah, I'm not a big fan of having to change kernel code in order to
>> use the feature.  I am quite intrigued by Geert Uytterhoeven's idea
>> to add a 'D' option to the config system, so that the record of which
>> modules to defer could be stored there.  This is much better than
>> hand-altering code.  I don't know how difficult this would be to add
>> to the kbuild system, but the mechanism for altering the macro would
>> be, IMHO, very straightforward.
>
> Straight forward but IMHO rather suboptimal. Sure it might be good
> enough if all you want is to ship products out the door, but for
> mainline something better should be done.

An alternative could be to add a processing step before linking,
changing the section name for initcalls you want to defer, based on a
small config file.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux