Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: drop Execute-In-Place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Just to be clear... We have XIP in the tree already.  If it is useful
> to someone, in-tree or out-of-tree, then it is worth keeping around.
> Even if the only user was out-of-tree which certainly wasn't the case
> when I added XIP support to the kernel, then ripping it out and adding
> it back later would be more trouble than preserving it.
>
> What I was asking recently is whether or not XIP is still useful to
> someone today.  Apparently it is, which is the answer I was looking for.

Surely it is. The last thing I tried was the i.mx deviation which is
very much based on what's in the tree. It didn't work out without some
bits of hackery and I never got it straight enough to try upstreaming.

But nevertheless, IMO XIP is not dead and is not going to be in the
closest future.

~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux