On 05/05/2011 12:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:54, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> On Thu, 5 May 2011, Tim Bird wrote: >>> On 05/05/2011 11:32 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 11:03 -0700, Tim Bird wrote: >>>>> On 05/05/2011 11:00 AM, Tim Bird wrote: >>>>>> On 05/05/2011 07:52 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >>>>>>> nearly no-one use it, only amop1, pxa and sa1100 implement it >>>>>> >>>>>> Sony uses this - a lot. Principally we're using this on a NEC >>>>>> naviengine part, which is ARM11MPCore based, support for which >>>>>> is (sadly) out of tree. >>>> >>>> If you're out of tree, you don't exist. >>> >>> Yeah - I know. I guess I should tell NEC we'll drop support >>> for their chip and move to another one that supports XIP >>> if they don't get their act together. If XIP survives... >> >> It is easy enough to keep it alive... as long as someone uses it of >> course. > > i think David's point: > ... someone <in tree> uses it ... I should add that I tried to use XIP on omap (for research purposes), but it was broken and I didn't have time to fix it. My bad. If anyone is using XIP on in-tree platforms, I'd like to hear about it. As for in-tree-ness - I thought the most recent message was to stay out of tree until the refactoring was over. ;-) -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Workgroup of the Linux Foundation Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Network Entertainment ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
