On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:25:41PM +0000, Tony Ibbs wrote: > > On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > You are using /proc/* to something that is not process related. > > At lkml you will be requested to use something else. > > OK. That's mainly through ignorance of what I *should* be using > instead (and perhaps poor reading of Linux Device Drivers). Do you > have an opinion on where such information should be going? I think sysfs is the better place. But my experience in this ares is limited. > >> If there is a better way for me to submit this, please let me know. > > > > One way you would not like.... > > Let the first patches introduce core-functionality and add features > > in later patches - touching the same file many times. > > Hmm. That's very sensible. Assuming I can figure out a sensible way > to do it (which I assume is what you expected me to object). It is a lot of work when you already have something that works. But sometimes it helps to do so. I have previously done a complete rewrite in the process (becuase my initial version was bad). Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
