Re: [PATCH] efi/unaccepted: Use ACPI reclaim memory for unaccepted memory table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 13:37, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 15:28, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/18/23 17:10, Kirill A . Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 05:03:59PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > >> On 8/16/23 14:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >>> Kyril reports that crashkernels fail to work on confidential VMs that
> > >>> rely on the unaccepted memory table, and this appears to be caused by
> > >>> the fact that it is not considered part of the set of firmware tables
> > >>> that the crashkernel needs to map.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is an oversight, and a result of the use of the EFI_LOADER_DATA
> > >>> memory type for this table. The correct memory type to use for any
> > >>> firmware table is EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY (including ones created by the
> > >>> EFI stub), even though the name suggests that is it specific to ACPI.
> > >>> ACPI reclaim means that the memory is used by the firmware to expose
> > >>> information to the operating system, but that the memory region has no
> > >>> special significance to the firmware itself, and the OS is free to
> > >>> reclaim the memory and use it as ordinary memory if it is not interested
> > >>> in the contents, or if it has already consumed them. In Linux, this
> > >>> memory is never reclaimed, but it is always covered by the kernel direct
> > >>> map and generally made accessible as ordinary memory.
> > >>>
> > >>> On x86, ACPI reclaim memory is translated into E820_ACPI, which the
> > >>> kexec logic already recognizes as memory that the crashkernel may need
> > >>> to to access, and so it will be mapped and accessible to the booting
> > >>> crash kernel.
> > >>>
> > >>> Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>    drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/unaccepted_memory.c | 2 +-
> > >>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/unaccepted_memory.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/unaccepted_memory.c
> > >>> index ca61f4733ea58693..9a655f30ba47db01 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/unaccepted_memory.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/unaccepted_memory.c
> > >>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ efi_status_t allocate_unaccepted_bitmap(__u32 nr_desc,
> > >>>     bitmap_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(unaccepted_end - unaccepted_start,
> > >>>                                EFI_UNACCEPTED_UNIT_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> > >>> -   status = efi_bs_call(allocate_pool, EFI_LOADER_DATA,
> > >>> +   status = efi_bs_call(allocate_pool, EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY,
> > >>
> > >> I bisected an SNP guest crash when using the tip tree to this commit. When
> > >> the kernel switches over to the swapper_pg_dir in init_mem_mapping(), the
> > >> unaccepted table is no longer mapped. Here's a copy of the stack trace:
> > >
> > > Could you try this patch:
> > >   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230917170629.d35gnwb6o54bdrhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Yes, that fixes the issue for me.
> >
>
> Thanks for confirming. I've queued it up already, I will send it out
> later this week.

Tom,

Could you confirm whether or not this is related to loading a crashkernel?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux