On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 17:45, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Very weird - could it have gotten lost in the sending process, on your > > side? > Lore does have them but I have no idea whose end caused this - I recently switched to Google's internal infrastructure for outgoing GIT email as our network does not permit outgoing SMTP to kernel.org but this is the first time I heard of a potential issue of this nature. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-24-ardb@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-26-ardb@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > In any case I've dropped patch #8 from tip:x86/boot as well - the first 6 > patches arrived fine and are in the intended order. > > Once the boot problem has been resolved, mind resending the rest? > > There are no changes in -tip that should be interfering: tip:x86/boot has > an upstream base. > Yeah I'll respin and resend. Thanks.