* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Very weird - could it have gotten lost in the sending process, on your > side? In any case I've dropped patch #8 from tip:x86/boot as well - the first 6 patches arrived fine and are in the intended order. Once the boot problem has been resolved, mind resending the rest? There are no changes in -tip that should be interfering: tip:x86/boot has an upstream base. Thanks, Ingo