On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 16:58, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2022 11:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > [...]
> >> for (;;) {
> >> - varname_size = EFIVARS_DATA_SIZE_MAX;
> >> + varname_size = record_size;
> >>
> >
> > I don't think we need this - this is the size of the variable name not
> > the variable itself.
> >
>
> Ugh, my bad. Do you want to stick with 1024 then?
Yes let's keep this at 1024
