On 14/10/2022 11:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> [...]
>> for (;;) {
>> - varname_size = EFIVARS_DATA_SIZE_MAX;
>> + varname_size = record_size;
>>
>
> I don't think we need this - this is the size of the variable name not
> the variable itself.
>
Ugh, my bad. Do you want to stick with 1024 then?
Thanks,
Guilherme
