On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Fair enough. I still think it is better for general hygiene to apply
> these changes, but if there is no urgency, I'll leave this for now and
> revisit+rebase somewhere during the next cycle.
Best it would be if you do that early in the cycle so that it gets
maximum testing in linux-next.
Oh, and my compiler doesn't like it for whatever reason:
/tmp/ccLB2vIC.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccLB2vIC.s: Error: invalid operands (.rodata and .text sections) for `-' when setting `.L__sym_size___efi64_thunk'
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:322: arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_thunk_64.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
But otherwise, I like the direction where this is going, of us not
mapping as much into the EFI PGT. But I've said that already...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
