Re: [PATCH v2] efi/arm: enable CP15 DMB instructions before cleaning the cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 01:38:12PM -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 09:42, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The EFI stub is entered with the caches and MMU enabled by the
> > firmware, and once the stub is ready to hand over to the decompressor,
> > we clean and disable the caches.
> >
> > The cache clean routines use CP15 barrier instructions, which can be
> > disabled via SCTLR. Normally, when using the provided cache handling
> > routines to enable the caches and MMU, this bit is enabled as well.
> > However, but since we entered the stub with the caches already enabled,
> > this routine is not executed before we call the cache clean routines,
> > resulting in undefined instruction exceptions if the firmware never
> > enabled this bit.
> >
> > So set the bit explicitly in the EFI entry code, but do so in a way that
> > guarantees that the resulting code can still run on v6 cores as well
> > (which are guaranteed to have CP15 barriers enabled)
> >
> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > index 6c7ccb428c07..c174098acdf1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > @@ -1438,7 +1438,21 @@ ENTRY(efi_stub_entry)
> >
> >                 @ Preserve return value of efi_entry() in r4
> >                 mov     r4, r0
> > -               bl      cache_clean_flush
> > +
> > +               @ our cache maintenance code relies on CP15 barrier instructions
> > +               @ but since we arrived here with the MMU and caches configured
> > +               @ by UEFI, we must check that the CP15BEN bit is set in SCTLR.
> > +               @ Note that this bit is RAO/WI on v6 and earlier, so the ISB in
> > +               @ the enable path will be executed on v7+ only.
> > +               mrc     p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0   @ read SCTLR
> > +               tst     r1, #(1 << 5)           @ CP15BEN bit set?
> > +               bne     0f
> > +               orr     r1, r1, #(1 << 5)       @ CP15 barrier instructions
> > +               mcr     p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0   @ write SCTLR
> > + ARM(          .inst   0xf57ff06f              @ isb           )
> > + THUMB(                isb                                             )
> > +
> > +0:             bl      cache_clean_flush
> >                 bl      cache_off
> >
> >                 @ Set parameters for booting zImage according to boot protocol
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> 
> Russell, do you mind if I take this through the EFI tree?

Yes I do mind.

> I had trouble logging into your patch system (it no longer recognizes my
> email address

I can't debug it based on that - what does it say?

> but when I try to re-create the account, my name is already taken)

Yes, duplicate accounts can't be created, but there is also a forgotten
password feature.

I've just checked and I can log in fine.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux