> > Because local_save_flags() does not disable interrupts??
>
> now that you say so, it does make sense…
>
> > > Anyway, I would still like to get rid of task_lock() in efi_switch_mm().
> > > Any objections to that?
> >
> > No, not at all.
> okay.
I don’t have any either and thanks for the clear commit message. It makes sense
why task_lock()/task_unlock() should go away.
Regards,
Sai
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
