On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 08:32:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The commit > > 318a19718261 ("device property: refactor built-in properties support") > > went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here > to get rid of union aliasing. > > Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value > of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). > > What union aliasing is? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as > "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in > section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the > members can be stored in a union object at any time'. > > Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store > as one type and read back as another. > > Why it's not good? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap > representation, although its member objects may be. > > Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than > the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. > > In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a > union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" > to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as > "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. > > While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do > type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to > unspecified behaviour. > > More information is available in this [1] blog post. > > [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ > > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html