Hi,
On 29-04-18 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 29 April 2018 at 10:40, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 29-04-18 09:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index 47d3efff6805..8650ab268ee7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
@@ -122,7 +122,14 @@ __setup_efi_pci32(efi_pci_io_protocol_32 *pci,
struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
return status;
- if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize)
+ /*
+ * Some firmwares contain EFI function pointers at the place
where the
+ * romimage and romsize fields are supposed to be. Typically the
EFI
+ * code is mapped at high addresses, translating to an
unrealistically
+ * large romsize. The UEFI spec limits the size of option ROMs to
16
+ * MiB so we reject any roms over 16 MiB in size to catch this.
+ */
+ if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize || pci->romsize > 0x1000000)
return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
size = pci->romsize + sizeof(*rom);
@@ -230,7 +237,14 @@ __setup_efi_pci64(efi_pci_io_protocol_64 *pci,
struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
return status;
- if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize)
+ /*
+ * Some firmwares contain EFI function pointers at the place
where the
+ * romimage and romsize fields are supposed to be. Typically the
EFI
+ * code is mapped at high addresses, translating to an
unrealistically
+ * large romsize. The UEFI spec limits the size of option ROMs to
16
+ * MiB so we reject any roms over 16 MiB in size to catch this.
+ */
+ if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize || pci->romsize > 0x1000000)
return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
Any reason why this couldn't be factored out into a efi_check_rom(pci)
kind of
helper function
The pci pointer is of 2 different types:
__setup_efi_pci32(efi_pci_io_protocol_32 *pci, ...
__setup_efi_pci64(efi_pci_io_protocol_64 *pci, ...
I guess I could give the helper a romimage and romsize argument to get
around that.
Ard, do you want me to do a v4 with such a helper ?
I think Lukas has a point, although I shouldn't expect you to implement that.
I will look into this myself, and rebase your patch on top of that.
Ok, thanks.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html