Re: [PATCH v3] efi: Ignore unrealistically large option roms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 29-04-18 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 29 April 2018 at 10:40, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,


On 29-04-18 09:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:


* Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index 47d3efff6805..8650ab268ee7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
@@ -122,7 +122,14 @@ __setup_efi_pci32(efi_pci_io_protocol_32 *pci,
struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
         if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
                 return status;
   -     if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize)
+       /*
+        * Some firmwares contain EFI function pointers at the place
where the
+        * romimage and romsize fields are supposed to be. Typically the
EFI
+        * code is mapped at high addresses, translating to an
unrealistically
+        * large romsize. The UEFI spec limits the size of option ROMs to
16
+        * MiB so we reject any roms over 16 MiB in size to catch this.
+        */
+       if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize || pci->romsize > 0x1000000)
                 return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
         size = pci->romsize + sizeof(*rom);
@@ -230,7 +237,14 @@ __setup_efi_pci64(efi_pci_io_protocol_64 *pci,
struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
         if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
                 return status;
   -     if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize)
+       /*
+        * Some firmwares contain EFI function pointers at the place
where the
+        * romimage and romsize fields are supposed to be. Typically the
EFI
+        * code is mapped at high addresses, translating to an
unrealistically
+        * large romsize. The UEFI spec limits the size of option ROMs to
16
+        * MiB so we reject any roms over 16 MiB in size to catch this.
+        */
+       if (!pci->romimage || !pci->romsize || pci->romsize > 0x1000000)
                 return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;


Any reason why this couldn't be factored out into a efi_check_rom(pci)
kind of
helper function


The pci pointer is of 2 different types:

__setup_efi_pci32(efi_pci_io_protocol_32 *pci, ...
__setup_efi_pci64(efi_pci_io_protocol_64 *pci, ...

I guess I could give the helper a romimage and romsize argument to get
around that.
Ard, do you want me to do a v4 with such a helper ?


I think Lukas has a point, although I shouldn't expect you to implement that.

I will look into this myself, and rebase your patch on top of that.

Ok, thanks.

Regards,

Hans

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux