efisubsys_init takes more than a few milliseconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Ard,


According to `initcall_debug`, `efisubsys_init` takes more than a few milliseconds to execute on a Dell XPS 13 9370 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8550U CPU @ 1.80GHz).

```
[…]
[    0.144474] calling  efisubsys_init+0x0/0x2cf @ 1
[    0.144474] Registered efivars operations
[    0.173690] initcall efisubsys_init+0x0/0x2cf returned 0 after 27343 usecs
[…]
```

To get a vanilla Linux kernel to boot in well under one second, it’d be nice if the time could be improved. Do you know, why it takes so long?

According to `bootgraph.py` from pm-graph [1][2] it takes even a little longer.

efisubsys_init: start=690.841, end=720.493, length(w/o overhead)=31.250 ms, return=0

There are several dozen calls to `virt_efi_get_next_variable()` all but one taking around 0.335 ms. This path needs to be optimized. Is that possible?

To reproduce this, clone the pm-graph repository [2], use `sudo ./bootgraph.py -f -fstat -maxdepth 10 -manual` to see what to add to `/boot/grub/grub.cfg`. Then reboot, and execute `sudo ./bootgraph.py -f -fstat -maxdepth 10`.

If your system is powerful enough, you can use a higher maximum depth. I didn’t get around how `-cgfilter` works to get smaller HTML files.


Kind regards,

Paul


[1] https://01.org/suspendresume
[2] https://github.com/01org/pm-graph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux