On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> EFI[1] stinks. Reading any file in /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/ generates
>>> 4 (yes FOUR!) SMIs.
>
>> Is that actualkly the normal implementation?
>
> I don't know if there are other implementations. This is what I see on my
> lab system.
Ok. I'm not a huge fan of EFI. Over-designed to the hilt. Happily at
least the loadable drivers are a thing of the past.
Do we have a list of things normal users care about? Because one thing
that would solve it is caching of the values. We don't want to do that
in general, but maybe we could just do it for the subset that we think
are "user accessible".
Although maybe just that "rate limit" thing would be simplest.
I don't want to break existing users, although it's not entirely clear
to me if there are any real use cases that matter to users. If tpmtotp
is the main case, maybe that can be changed to work around it and just
cache a value or something?
So I could imagine just applying Joe's / Andy's patch to see if
anybody even notices. But if somebody does, we'd have to go to the
alternatives anyway.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
