On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:48:37AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 4 December 2017 at 09:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:29:28PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > >> On 12/04/17 at 08:36am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > >> > > +#define __ATTR_IRUSR(_name) { \ > >> > > + .attr = { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = S_IRUSR }, \ > >> > > + .show = _name##_show, \ > >> > > +} > >> > > >> > Ick, no, as others, including Linus, have said, using IRUSER is a pain > >> > in the ass to try to look up and remember what it is... > >> > > >> > Just use __ATTR() please, it should be fine for what you need to do, > >> > which is special-case a sysfs attribute. > >> > >> Hmm, I was hesitating to do that because it needs either long code > >> (over 80 chars) or some driver internal macros. > >> > >> There is already same issue in dmi-sysfs.c, it uses an internal macro > >> DMI_SYSFS_ATTR for 0400 attr. I did not search all the kernel code, > >> there might be more for such special cases. Maybe we can add some > >> comment in sysfs.h to mention this is for some special case? > >> > >> I can do something similar as dmi sysfs code though. > > > > Hm, let me look at this this afternoon when I get through some stable > > patches, it shouldn't be that complex to need a whole new macro... > > > > But wasn't that the whole point? That there is a macro that does what > you don't want (__ATTR_RO) and none that does what you do want? my point is that __ATTR() should work for you as-is... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html