On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> struct hv_fcopy_hdr { >> __u32 operation; >> - uuid_le service_id0; /* currently unused */ >> - uuid_le service_id1; /* currently unused */ >> + __u8 service_id0[16]; /* currently unused */ >> + __u8 service_id1[16]; /* currently unused */ >> } __attribute__((packed)); > > Even user space may not have all guid_t operations, could you still > put guid_t here for consistency? I'm not sure how this code has been designed, though uuid_le followed by guid_t are kernel internal types mistakenly put to UAPI in the first place. Consistency here is how we treat those types in user space, starting from v4.13 uuid_be gone from that header. uuid_le is luckily will be gone soon. > This file is also used by our kernel > mode code. It will work still the same after this change. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html