Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You called out five distinct features in 0/5, so how about > a bit for each of those? Actually, there are more than five in that list - there are three in the first item - and I'm not sure the remaining categories are quite as well defined as I made it seem. Also, that sort of categorisation might not be what we actually need: it might end up coming down to a no-write vs no-read-or-write split instead. > Actually, I don't care which way you go. The current code works > for me. I am just concerned that the granularity fiends might come > around later. In that case, I'll leave it as is for the moment. It doesn't introduce so many calls that they're impossible to change. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
