On 25 April 2017 at 16:07, Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25/04/17 16:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 25 April 2017 at 16:00, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Apr, at 08:32:59PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> This picks up the patches Ard send before in [1], including the >>>> "left-over" patches 6..8. >>>> >>>> As Ard suggested, I've taken updated patches 6 and 7 of him from [2] >>>> which address reviewer comments. Furthermore, I've changed patch 8 to >>>> factor out the Quark quirk logic from the overloaded >>>> efi_capsule_setup_info as requested by Matt and also applied Andy's >>>> suggestion to have a quirk dispatcher table with callbacks. >>>> >>>> Tested successfully on the IOT2040 - still without a working Galileo >>>> board. >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg11194.html >>>> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=quark-capsule >>>> >>>> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Ard Biesheuvel (2): >>>> efi/capsule-loader: Redirect calls to efi_capsule_setup_info via weak >>>> alias >>>> efi/capsule-loader: Use page addresses rather than struct page >>>> pointers >>>> >>>> Jan Kiszka (1): >>>> efi/capsule: Add support for Quark security header >>>> >>>> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 9 +++ >>>> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c | 66 ++++++++-------- >>>> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c | 7 +- >>>> include/linux/efi.h | 14 +++- >>>> 5 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) >>> >>> OK, this looks like it's in good shape to me. >>> >>> Ard, are we waiting for anything else before we queue this up for >>> v4.13? >> >> Ideally, we'd get someone to test it with compliant capsule headers, >> but I'm happy to just queue it for v4.13, and get it in -next asap >> (i.e., right after the merge window closes) >> > > I'm OOO until Thursday however, I could test this out on a Galileo for > you with the CSH stripped out. As Jan has pointed out Galileo aka Quark > x1000 non-secure (not to be called insecure) will just skips past the > CSH anyway - so - we can give it a conformant capsule by stripping the > CSH junk off the top. > > How about you queue it up and I'll let you know if there's a problem > Thursday? > That would be highly appreciated, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html