Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: fix absolute relocation detection for older toolchains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/10/16 18:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 October 2016 at 22:30, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Oct, at 11:34:31AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
>>> These relocations are harmless, since the debug ones are only
>>> interpreted by the debugger, and the ones generated by
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort) will never be referenced, since the symbols they
>>> contain are either renamed to __efistub_xxx (arm64), or they are not
>>> part of the kernel proper (arm)
>>>
>>> So both cases are false positives, but the diagnostic is important,
>>> and so breaking the build is appropriate for any other absolute
>>> relocation that may appear.
>>>
>>> The effect of the patch is not that the diagnostic is ignored, but
>>> that these relocations are not generated in the first place (-g0) or
>>> removed explicitly (ksymtab/krcrctab+sort) rather than via a wildcard.
>>> So other than not breaking the build, this patch should have no user
>>> observeable differences.
>>
>> Thanks Ard, sounds reasonable. Feel free to take this through
>> whichever tree you think is best.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks Matt.
> 
> Arnd: could you take this on top of the patch that adds CONFIG_EFI to
> multi_v7_defconfig? That would minimize the breakage, I think.

Can someone pick up this fix? -next has been broken for me since 20th
Sept :-(

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux