On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote: > > > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does > > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to > > do it? > > Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I > think is the correct way to go given that our (reasonable) assumptions > about reboot notifier concurrency are not guaranteed, > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h9eked24.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sure, that works. I considered doing it that way but it seemed more complicated. Please use that patch instead of mine. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
