On 13 April 2016 at 12:24, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr, at 10:29:23AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> I think it is implied by the spec that this table and the one returned >> by GetMemoryMap() use mutually compatible definitions of >> EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR. However, since our definition of the struct >> type is based on version 1, we should perhaps add a check for that >> separately > > That makes sense. Could you send a patch for that on top of 'next' > (I've dropped the desc_size check now)? > OK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
