On Wed, 13 Apr, at 10:29:23AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > I think it is implied by the spec that this table and the one returned > by GetMemoryMap() use mutually compatible definitions of > EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR. However, since our definition of the struct > type is based on version 1, we should perhaps add a check for that > separately That makes sense. Could you send a patch for that on top of 'next' (I've dropped the desc_size check now)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
