Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] ARM/efi minor fixes + stub pre-boot compat checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:29:20PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb, at 05:18:12PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 11 February 2016 at 17:16, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Feb, at 04:50:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >> I merged two EFI/ARM related series, whose v1's I sent out last week:
> > >>
> > >> Changes since v1:
> > >> - added various tags from various people
> > >> - new patch #3 to undefine __init
> > >>
> > >> @Matt: are you happy with all of this going through the arm64 tree? I don't
> > >> think it clashes with anything else we've got queued up for v4.6 in tip/efi/core
> > >
> > > How come this is going through the arm64 tree? Are there other patch
> > > series that this depends on or that depend on it?
> > >
> > > If it makes the most sense to take it through that tree, then I'm fine
> > > with it but I'd like to hear a rationale.
> > 
> > I simply thought it would be most convenient, since it touches
> > ARM-specific files only. But if you feel it should go via the EFI tree
> > instead, that is also fine by me.
> 
> Since the diff stat is heavily weighted towards drivers/firmware/efi I
> think it should go via the EFI tree. So I'll pick this up (the changes
> look fine) unless Will or Catalin complain otherwise.

No complaints here (the arm64 bits are all acked).

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux