On 11 February 2016 at 17:16, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 04 Feb, at 04:50:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> I merged two EFI/ARM related series, whose v1's I sent out last week: >> >> Changes since v1: >> - added various tags from various people >> - new patch #3 to undefine __init >> >> @Matt: are you happy with all of this going through the arm64 tree? I don't >> think it clashes with anything else we've got queued up for v4.6 in tip/efi/core > > How come this is going through the arm64 tree? Are there other patch > series that this depends on or that depend on it? > > If it makes the most sense to take it through that tree, then I'm fine > with it but I'd like to hear a rationale. I simply thought it would be most convenient, since it touches ARM-specific files only. But if you feel it should go via the EFI tree instead, that is also fine by me. Thanks, Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
