Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] efi: export efi_capsule_supported() function symbol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/10/15 11:53, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 5:27 AM

Wilson - trying to test this out on a Galileo Gen2 - which branch are you doing
this against ?

I can apply the first patch you're proposing to squash your commit into

https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2014/10/7/390/1

but then trying to apply the first in your series on top of that patch I get

deckard@aineko:~/Development/linux$ git
apply ../patches/capsule_wilson/1_2.eml
../patches/capsule_wilson/1_2.eml:72: trailing whitespace.
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efi_capsule_supported);
error: drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c: No such file or directory

https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi/+/
capsule/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c


??

If you are applying Matt's patch https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2014/10/7/390/1 which
had been created 1 year ago to mainline vanilla kernel (Linux 4.3-rc4), you are not
able to direct patch in due to the Makefile error below:

~/MyWorks/linux_mainline$ git apply .git/rebase-apply/0001 --reject
Checking patch arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 527 (offset 11 lines).
Checking patch drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile...
error: while searching for:
#
# Makefile for linux kernel
#
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)                       += efi.o vars.o reboot.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS)                  += efivars.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE)           += efi-pstore.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UEFI_CPER)                 += cper.o

error: patch failed: drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile:1
Checking patch drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c...
Checking patch drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c...
Checking patch include/linux/efi.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 122 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 983 (offset 23 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1235 (offset 23 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1317 (offset 23 lines).
Applied patch arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile with 1 rejects...
Rejected hunk #1.
Applied patch drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c cleanly.
Applied patch include/linux/efi.h cleanly.

You should resolve the Makefile error and then git add 5 files below:
- arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
- drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
- drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c
- include/linux/efi.h
- drivers/firmware/efi/capsule.c

then you are able to patch in my patchset.


If so - then why not use the interface here ?
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi/+/
capsule

(Sorry I know I'm coming to this thread late)

Aside from that, I'm curious which types of capsules you've used here too -
does it include the MFH header ? Keep in mind the initial firmware that
shipped with Galileo will depend on that MFH being present.

http://download.intel.com/support/processors/quark/sb/quark_secureboot
prm_330234_001.pdf
- Section A1 - table 7 ?

So if we boot a 4.x kernel with that initial firmware version 0.75 if memory
serves - it's important that the capsule.c code handles the MFH.


Already got agreement with Matt that Quark Security Header patch will not
be upstream to mainline as it is not a standard header. So Intel will carry this
patch ourselves.

Right... so what sort of capsule are you testing with ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux