On Wed, 26 Mar, at 03:08:00PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> Hmmm... I am not sure which approach is better. I saw that
> in many places declarations have annotations. Could you
> point me some docs which states (and explains) that this
> is wrong idea.
Note I've had the following patch from Joe queued up for weeks. It's in
the tip tree and will be sent to Linus during the merge window.
----
commit 9b7d204982cf
Author: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jan 3 16:08:48 2014 -0800
x86/efi: Style neatening
Coalesce formats and remove spaces before tabs.
Move __initdata after the variable declaration.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index dc1dd6d09dec..876dc5b9e4a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct efi_memory_map memmap;
static struct efi efi_phys __initdata;
static efi_system_table_t efi_systab __initdata;
-static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t arch_tables[] = {
+static efi_config_table_type_t arch_tables[] __initdata = {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV
{UV_SYSTEM_TABLE_GUID, "UVsystab", &efi.uv_systab},
#endif
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t arch_tables[] = {
u64 efi_setup; /* efi setup_data physical address */
-static bool __initdata disable_runtime = false;
+static bool disable_runtime __initdata = false;
static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
{
disable_runtime = true;
@@ -263,9 +263,9 @@ static efi_status_t __init phys_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm,
int efi_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec *now)
{
unsigned long nowtime = now->tv_sec;
- efi_status_t status;
- efi_time_t eft;
- efi_time_cap_t cap;
+ efi_status_t status;
+ efi_time_t eft;
+ efi_time_cap_t cap;
struct rtc_time tm;
status = efi.get_time(&eft, &cap);
@@ -283,9 +283,8 @@ int efi_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec *now)
eft.second = tm.tm_sec;
eft.nanosecond = 0;
} else {
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "%s: Invalid EFI RTC value: write of %lx to EFI RTC failed\n",
- __FUNCTION__, nowtime);
+ pr_err("%s: Invalid EFI RTC value: write of %lx to EFI RTC failed\n",
+ __func__, nowtime);
return -1;
}
@@ -401,8 +400,7 @@ static void __init print_efi_memmap(void)
p < memmap.map_end;
p += memmap.desc_size, i++) {
md = p;
- pr_info("mem%02u: type=%u, attr=0x%llx, "
- "range=[0x%016llx-0x%016llx) (%lluMB)\n",
+ pr_info("mem%02u: type=%u, attr=0x%llx, range=[0x%016llx-0x%016llx) (%lluMB)\n",
i, md->type, md->attribute, md->phys_addr,
md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT),
(md->num_pages >> (20 - EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)));
@@ -434,9 +432,8 @@ void __init efi_reserve_boot_services(void)
memblock_is_region_reserved(start, size)) {
/* Could not reserve, skip it */
md->num_pages = 0;
- memblock_dbg("Could not reserve boot range "
- "[0x%010llx-0x%010llx]\n",
- start, start+size-1);
+ memblock_dbg("Could not reserve boot range [0x%010llx-0x%010llx]\n",
+ start, start+size-1);
} else
memblock_reserve(start, size);
}
@@ -572,8 +569,7 @@ static int __init efi_systab_init(void *phys)
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((efi.systab->hdr.revision >> 16) == 0)
- pr_err("Warning: System table version "
- "%d.%02d, expected 1.00 or greater!\n",
+ pr_err("Warning: System table version %d.%02d, expected 1.00 or greater!\n",
efi.systab->hdr.revision >> 16,
efi.systab->hdr.revision & 0xffff);
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
