>>> On 26.03.14 at 15:08, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:21:19PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 25.03.14 at 21:57, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Export arch_tables variable. Xen init function calls efi_config_init() >> > which takes it as an argument. >> > >> > Additionally, put __initdata in place suggested by include/linux/init.h. >> >> Which isn't necessarily the most appropriate place. > > Why? If comments in include/linux/init.h are not valid they should be > changed. Because they can't go there uniformly: While on function declarations you can put them there, on function definitions they need to come before the function name. And placing attributes between type and name does - iirc - work consistently for everything. >> > --- a/include/linux/efi.h >> > +++ b/include/linux/efi.h >> > @@ -583,6 +583,8 @@ extern struct efi { >> > struct efi_memory_map *memmap; >> > } efi; >> > >> > +extern efi_config_table_type_t arch_tables[] __initdata; >> >> And section placement annotations are bogus on declarations. > > Hmmm... I am not sure which approach is better. I saw that > in many places declarations have annotations. Could you > point me some docs which states (and explains) that this > is wrong idea. Just use common sense: Attributes that are of concern to the caller should go on the declaration. Attributes that only affect code generation for the function/object in question should go on the definition. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html