On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:04:07PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > +void __init create_id_mapping(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size, int map_io)
> > +{
> > + pgd_t *pgd = &idmap_pg_dir[pgd_index(addr)];
> > +
> > + if (pgd >= &idmap_pg_dir[ARRAY_SIZE(idmap_pg_dir)]) {
> > + pr_warn("BUG: not creating id mapping for 0x%016llx\n", addr);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + __create_mapping(pgd, addr, addr, size, map_io);
> > +}
>
> I'm a bit worried because I gave some feedback in the past but it didn't
> make to this patch.
>
> What I said on 22nd of January:
>
> The condition above is always false since pgd_index() already ands the
> index with (PTRS_PER_PGD - 1). Better check addr against something like
> (PTRS_PER_PGD * PGDIR_SIZE) (for clarity, you could do other shifts,
> doesn't really matter).
>
Sorry about that. I remember making this change but I don't know what
happened to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
