Re: [PATCH 06/22] Add helper functions used by arm/arm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Feb, at 05:03:57PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> From: Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the get_dram_base() function and efi_call_physN() macros
>> that are shared by arm/arm64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> These changes should be in drivers/firmware/efi/arm-stub.c -
> efi-stub-helper.c is not a dumping ground for random
> architecture-specific code.

Hi Matt,

  I will move those functions/macros to the arm-stub.c file.  I agree
that the macros should go there, as they are the arm specific versions
and conflict with the x86 versions defined elsewhere.  These were
there before the arm-stub.c file was added and didn't get moved when
it was.  The get_dram_base() function is only used by arm/arm64, but
there is nothing architecture specific about it, which is why I put it
here to begin with.  I don't feel strongly about this either way.

Thanks,
Roy


>
> --
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux