On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We do have such machines, which is why this change has been reverted twice already. I believe we should stick to the priority scheme I proposed a few weeks ago.
I seem to have missed that discussion, and couldn't find it after a
brief search. Got a pointer?
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
