Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 00:58 -0300 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:23:55 +0100 > hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Am Freitag, den 27.03.2009, 07:38 -0300 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:39:07 +0100 > > > hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > But my main concern is, if it once arrived at patchwork formally, it is > > > > out of sight for most of us and might miss proper review, except you are > > > > sure you can always guarantee that. I don't want to start to argue about > > > > all what happened in the past. > > > > > > > > So, at least, if some patch arrived there mysteriously ;), the > > > > linux-media list should be informed that it is there now and last time > > > > to speak off, in case anything is not fully clear, before vanishing into > > > > some black hole until you find it in the next kernel release ... > > > > > > The only way to send patches to patchwork is to submit it via linux-media list. > > > There's no other way. So, all patch discussions and reviews should happen at > > > the ML, by replying at the patch email (or by replying another reply). > > > Patchwork will keep track of such replies as well. > > > > > > > What happened so far with this patches is quite funny, > > for me some black hole seems to be involved. > > > > Klaas did send them the first time, also directly to me, on Tue, 24 Mar > > 2009 23:14:11 +0100. > > > > Now I can see you have pulled them in already on Wednesday. > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/5efa9fbc8a88 > > > > There is no trace anymore on patchwork visible to me. > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list > > So I don't know how you processed them. > > The above link uses the default patchwork filtering. By default it shows only > patches where there's an action required (e. g. New or Under Review patches). > > To view a full list of the patches, you need to click at filters and select any. > > You'll see all patches: > http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?state=* > > In the specific case od Klaas, this is his patch: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/14405/ > > > Most confusing is, that Klaas obviously did not receive a mail > > notification from linuxtv-commits that his patch came in. > > > > > Last message date: Fri Feb 15 19:45:02 CET 2008 > > Archived on: Fri Feb 15 19:45:04 CET 2008 > > > > Is it broken or only the archive not up to date? > > > > I've received the notification here: > > From: Patch from klaas de waal <hg-commit@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: linuxtv-commits@xxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: , Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, klaas de waal <klaas.de.waal@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [linuxtv-commits] [hg:v4l-dvb] tda827x: fix locking issues with DVB-C > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:05:01 +0100 > Reply-To: klaas de waal via Mercurial <klaas.de.waal@xxxxxxxxx> > Sender: linuxtv-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > > The patch number 11236 was added via Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> > to http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb master development tree. > > Klaas should be received this also. Maybe some anti-spam filtering on his side? > > You'll probably see this also at the linuxtv-commits archives. > > > Why else he would have posted a second time on > > Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:53:02 +0100 not knowing anything about the status of > > his patches, which made me believe I should try to help him? > > > > The timestamp on your mercurial commit of them is > > Wed Mar 25 20:53:02 2009 +0000 (2 days ago) > > That is the time when his second email arrived converted to Greenwich > > time? Or how could you commit within the same second that mail arrived? > > > This is the time the patches have on both of his original mails. > > --- a/linux/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda827x.c Tue Mar 24 21:12:47 2009 +0000 > > --- a/linux/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda827x.c Tue Mar 24 21:12:47 2009 +0000 > > The import scripts will try to preserve the original date of the sent email. > > So, the date there is when the code were presented to public. > > > How can I ever know when they were really added and if they went through > > patchwork :) > > > > I was just about to suggest Klaas should try again with [PATCH] in the > > subject until they are listed at patchwork. > > If the patch was received by patchwork, and "disappeared", all you need to do > is to click on filter and select a proper filter, like: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?submitter=klaas&state=* > > This will present all patches authored by "klaas", and their state. Ah, if you > click on the patch, you'll see all the patch history, including the > sent/received emails. Even this email should be added there by patchwork ;) > > Cheers, > Mauro Mauro, you are joking. How I ever could come to that from here? http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list I'm forced to read the source code. There seems to be some serious utf8 bug too. Cheers, Hermann _______________________________________________ linux-dvb users mailing list For V4L/DVB development, please use instead linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
