Nico Sabbi wrote: > BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this > *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than > to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His > Majesty the ML administrator. > Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least > explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken? > Please, no speculations: just facts. This is the standard practice on kernel development lists. See e.g. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- Anssi Hannula _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
