Am Donnerstag, den 27.11.2008, 09:19 -0800 schrieb VDR User: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 06:08 -0800, VDR User wrote: > >> Does anyone here actually disagree that the approach multiproto takes > >> is a great solution that should be adopted (if possible)? > > > > Does anyone here disagree that the above question is a troll? > > > > My point is that silence on internet mailing lists is not concurrence. > > > > This is especially the case if people are trying to avoid conflict by > > not reacting to people trolling for conflict. > > I hope you don't expect to be taken seriously after your absurd > comment. This conversation is about addressing and finding a solution > to a problem. I'm not even the person who originally brought up the > solution used in multiproto but as far as I can see, it does seem to > be a great solution so I question why that method shouldn't be > adopted. > > It's ridiculous I need to point any of this out to you but one > possible reason is that _you_ are in fact the one trolling here. Yes, after all, we know for sure Andy is a troll. Go away. > Afterall, the only posting you've made has absolutely nothing to do > with the subject, while all of mine do. Please contribute something > relevant or find some other thread to infect. > > And by the way, most of us have accepted the outcome of the > s2api/multiproto controversy. Maybe it's about time you find a way to > move on as well. Good luck to you. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-dvb mailing list > linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
