On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 06:08 -0800, VDR User wrote: >> Does anyone here actually disagree that the approach multiproto takes >> is a great solution that should be adopted (if possible)? > > Does anyone here disagree that the above question is a troll? > > My point is that silence on internet mailing lists is not concurrence. > > This is especially the case if people are trying to avoid conflict by > not reacting to people trolling for conflict. I hope you don't expect to be taken seriously after your absurd comment. This conversation is about addressing and finding a solution to a problem. I'm not even the person who originally brought up the solution used in multiproto but as far as I can see, it does seem to be a great solution so I question why that method shouldn't be adopted. It's ridiculous I need to point any of this out to you but one possible reason is that _you_ are in fact the one trolling here. Afterall, the only posting you've made has absolutely nothing to do with the subject, while all of mine do. Please contribute something relevant or find some other thread to infect. And by the way, most of us have accepted the outcome of the s2api/multiproto controversy. Maybe it's about time you find a way to move on as well. Good luck to you. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
