Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Manu, > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Manu Abraham wrote: > >> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> [..] >>> The main arguments in favor of S2API over Multiproto are: >>> >> >> [..] >> >>> - Capability of allowing improvements even on the existing >>> standards, >>> like allowing diversity control that starts to appear on newer DVB >>> devices. >> >> >> I just heard from Patrick, what he meant by this at the meeting and the >> reason why he voted for S2API, due to a fact that he was convinced >> incorrectly. Multiproto _already_has_ this implementation, while it is >> non-existant in S2API. > > In order to not have people getting me wrong here, I'm stating now in > public: > > 1) I like the idea of having diversity optionally controlled by the > application. You can add in a field for diversity in the relevant delivery system data structure (in frontend.h) for it to be handled by the application optionally, that shouldn't be an issue as far as i can see. > 2) My vote for S2API is final. > > It is final, because the S2API is mainly affecting > include/linux/dvb/frontend.h to add user-API support for new standards. > I prefer the user-API of S2API over the one of multiproto because of 1). > Regards, Manu _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
