Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: [..] > The main arguments in favor of S2API over Multiproto are: > [..] > - Capability of allowing improvements even on the existing standards, > like allowing diversity control that starts to appear on newer DVB > devices. I just heard from Patrick, what he meant by this at the meeting and the reason why he voted for S2API, due to a fact that he was convinced incorrectly. Multiproto _already_has_ this implementation, while it is non-existant in S2API. When S2API doesn't have any complete implementation: true yes, the patches are really small. Void is beautiful too. DVB-S2 runtime MODCOD changes are much more complex than a simple diversity control (professional uses). It is very simple to add this use case without unnecessarily getting the user to be involved for dvb-core internals. Well it is not just diversity alone or just DVB-S2 MODCOD dynamic changes, but this can be applied in a generic fashion to any other in a similar fashion. I just did an exhaustive explanation to Patrick on his concern on diversity (or similar) control, probably he can share his thoughts in here. Manu _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
