Le Sunday 14 September 2008 18:47:00 Steven Toth, vous avez écrit : > Steven Toth wrote: > > Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008, Steven Toth wrote: > >>> Christophe Thommeret wrote: > >>>> As far as i understand, the cinergyT2 driver is a bit unusual, e.g. > >>>> dvb_register_frontend is never called (hence no dtv_* log messages). > >>>> I don't know if there is others drivers like this, but this has to > >>>> be investigated cause rewritting all drivers for S2API could be a > >>>> bit of work :) > >>>> > >>>> P.S. > >>>> I think there is an alternate driver for cinergyT2 actually in > >>>> developement but idon't remember where it's located neither its state. > >>> > >>> Good to know. (I also saw your followup email). I have zero > >>> experience with the cinergyT2 but the old api should still be working > >>> reliably. I plan to investigate this, sounds like a bug! :) > >> > >> Holger was of the opinion that having the demux in dvb-core > >> was stupid for devices which have no hw demux, so he > >> programmed around dvb-core. His plan was to add a > >> mmap-dma-buffers kind of API to the frontend device, > >> but it never got implemented. > >> > >> Anyway, it's bad if one driver is different than all the others. > > > > Hmm, I didn't realize this, good to know. > > > > Now it's peaked my interest, I'll have to look at the code. > > > > The existing API should still work at a bare minimum, if it's not - it > > needs to. > > So I looked the the cinergyT2 code, that's a complete eye-opener. It has > it's own ioctl handler, outside of dvb-core. > > It's a good news / bad news thing. > > The good news is that this driver will not be effected by the S2API > changes, so nothing can break. > > The bad news is that this driver will not be effected by the S2API > changes, so it doesn't get the benefit. > > Regardless of S2API or multiproto, I see no reason why we shouldn't > bring this driver back into dvb-core. > > I don't have a device to test, but here's a patch (0% tested, with bugs > probably) that converts the module back to a regular dvb-core compatible > device, so the S2API would work with this. If anyone wants to test this, > and finds bugs - I won't get back to this driver for a couple of weeks - > so your patches would be welcome. :) > > Frankly, is S2API is selected for merge and we have enough users of the > current non-dvb-core driver, I'll probably re-write it from the spec. > > So much to do, so little time. > > - Steve Steve, as you expected, it's abit buggy and crashes at load ;) i've searched for the alternative cinergyT2 driver. it's available at: http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tmerle/cinergyT2/ haven't tried it yet but will do (at least several people seems to have it working). -- Christophe Thommeret _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
