Hi, Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 22:13 +0200 schrieb Johannes Stezenbach: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008, Oliver Endriss wrote: > > Steven Toth wrote: > > > > > > http://www.steventoth.net/linux/s2 > > > > Guys, I don't like the way you do this. ;-( > > > > Why didn't you propose this API when we reviewed multiproto? > > Meanwhile there are applications (vdr, others?) which implement the > > multiproto API. > > The proposal isn't new, there was some discussion on the > list in Nov 2007. For reasons unknown to me I cannot > find Steve's original mail on the topic in the list archives, > but here's my reply: > > http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2007-November/021618.html > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.dvb/37214 > > Johannes > I might still be wrong, but since such stuff did get _very_ personal sometimes, I still ask why. Fact is, tell me lies, that potential and good people were running for NDAs very hard that time and some did know this game already better than others, who were giving the patch monkeys. I still do say, that this whole mess we saw, is fully caused by kernel rules and accepted as collateral damage. Tell me, who did try to intercept these obviously colliding trains from somewhere above and backed you to stop it? Greetings, Hermann _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
