insomniac wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:57:29 +0200
Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx> wrote:
I think it is not correct driver .inf file. inf-file you have is for
Pinnacle PCTV 72e with product ID 0236 and lsusb you have has product
ID 0237.
You are right. Here is the correct (I think) .inf
http://rafb.net/p/UFxQHw88.html
yes, thats correct. I made simple patch, you can test if it does
something nasty. You can also look dib0700_devices.c file and try some
changes. Patch can be applied towards current v4l-dvb-master.
regards
Antti
--
http://palosaari.fi/
diff -r 2e9a92dbe2be linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dib0700_devices.c
--- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dib0700_devices.c Sun Mar 16 12:14:12 2008 -0300
+++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dib0700_devices.c Mon Mar 17 04:28:33 2008 +0200
@@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ struct usb_device_id dib0700_usb_id_tabl
{ USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_ASUS, USB_PID_ASUS_U3100) },
/* 25 */ { USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_HAUPPAUGE, USB_PID_HAUPPAUGE_NOVA_T_STICK_3) },
{ USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_HAUPPAUGE, USB_PID_HAUPPAUGE_MYTV_T) },
+ { USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_PINNACLE, 0x0237) }, // PCTV 73e looks similar as PCTV 2000e
{ 0 } /* Terminating entry */
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, dib0700_usb_id_table);
@@ -1032,7 +1033,7 @@ struct dvb_usb_device_properties dib0700
}
},
- .num_device_descs = 4,
+ .num_device_descs = 5,
.devices = {
{ "Pinnacle PCTV 2000e",
{ &dib0700_usb_id_table[11], NULL },
@@ -1048,6 +1049,10 @@ struct dvb_usb_device_properties dib0700
},
{ "DiBcom STK7700D reference design",
{ &dib0700_usb_id_table[14], NULL },
+ { NULL },
+ },
+ { "Pinnacle PCTV 73e",
+ { &dib0700_usb_id_table[27], NULL },
{ NULL },
}
},
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
