Philip Pemberton wrote: > Here's a scan file for Emley Moor with the correct frequencies and tuning > parameters... Seems the one in the linux-dvb distribution has frequencies with > a -133kHz or so offset, and without the correct QAM parameters. Probably my > fault, because IIRC I submitted that tuning file... > > Data sourced from www.ukfree.tv, and works fine on my HVR-3000. > > # Emley Moor, West Yorkshire > # T freq bw fec_hi fec_lo mod transmission-mode guard-interval hierarchy > T 626000000 8MHz 2/3 3/4 QAM64 2k 1/32 NONE > T 650000000 8MHz 2/3 3/4 QAM64 2k 1/32 NONE > T 674000000 8MHz 3/4 3/4 QAM16 2k 1/32 NONE > T 698000000 8MHz 3/4 3/4 QAM16 2k 1/32 NONE > T 706000000 8MHz 3/4 3/4 QAM16 2k 1/32 NONE > T 722000000 8MHz 3/4 3/4 QAM16 2k 1/32 NONE Have you looked at the Ofcom site? You may find that the current frequencies are actually correct. Apparently all the transmitters at Emley Moor have a 166kHz offset, either + or - depending on the channel. See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/dtt_pocket_guide_3_0.pdf which lists all the UK transmitters and their offsets. www.ukfree.tv seems to ignore the offset and just include the base channel number. Generally it doesn't matter since the bandwidth of the tuner will be more than sufficient. Of course, it would be a good idea to fix the QAM parameters if they're wrong. David _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
