On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:55:48PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> I already mentioned this in my previous email. Please read the previous
> mails and or the old discussions.
Would you point the mail to me where you did - I cant find any - You
said that for GET_PARAMS you need the space to store it. I ask you to
point out why the kernel code decides to ignore it on SET_PARAMS.
> Your 2nd option won't work at all. It is completely broken when you have
> to query statistics, before a SET_PARAMS.
What statistics can i possibly ask for when i didnt set any parameters?
Why not return EAGAIN if i ask for stats which are not there - that
would be a sane way to respond to it instead of garbling the tuner state
on a GET_INFO ...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@xxxxxxxxxx +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
