On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:09:23PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> >As i already wrote - SET_PARAMS is _NOT_ enough. Please try yourself.
> >Unload/Load the module and simple issue a DVBFE_SET_PARAMS (NOT
> >GET_INFO) and it doesnt tune/lock at least for STB0899 and it also
> >complains in the dmesg with:
> >
> > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0
> > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0
> > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0
> > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0
> > stb0899_search: Unsupported delivery system 0
> > stb0899_read_status: Unsupported delivery system 0
> >
> >although i set
> >
> > dvbfe_params.delivery=DVBFE_DELSYS_DVBS2;
>
> Yep, it isn't supposed to work that way with simply issuing SET_PARAMS.
Okay - So either
- remove the "delivery" in the dvbfe_params because it is unnecessary,
confusing and broken, and rename the GET_INFO call to SET_DELIVERY
or something which implies that its not a _GET_ call
or
- make SET_PARAMS the call to honor delivery in dvbfe_params and remove
the setting of the delivery of GET_INFO
I'd prefere the 2nd option because currently the usage and naming
is an incoherent mess which should better not get more adopters ..
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@xxxxxxxxxx +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
