Am Mittwoch 28 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari: > Christoph Pfister wrote: <snip> > > The proposed splitting is a bit problematic, because you have specific > > entries and a "fallback" (maybe cause some confusion among users). And > > it is hard to check as I _quite_ soon realised. > > "fallbacks" ? > I just added one intial tuning file containing reference channels used > by most networks and added own tuning files for cases where it was > deviated from reference one. Sorry if it's badly worded ... From a user perspective in order to get the optimal result you first have to check whether there is a specific fi-* for your location and if there isn't any, you use the reference channels. That's what I meant with "fallback" ;) > > As you have all the necessary information in one table I decided to > > create a single file containing every case (it isn't the smallest one, > > I know, but within the limits and quite easy to review and maintain). > > Thats ok for me. > > > Thank you very much for your effort! > > > > Christoph > > thanks > Antti <snip> Christoph _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
